Versionen
25. August 2011
29. Juli 2011
28. Juli 2011
1. Juli 2011
28. Juni 2011
16. Mai 2011
27. März 2011
Undid revision 420978556 by Cassowary (talk) Let's stick with numbers
−11
high-risk|"6,200,000+" -> "well over six million": reduced precision makes it more correct!
+11
9. März 2011
14. Februar 2011
2. Februar 2011
20. Januar 2011
13. Januar 2011
7. Januar 2011
→Optional parameters: deprecated
−406
→General: update
−147
→Deprecated parameters: update
+1
→Examples: update
−38
28. Dezember 2010
8. Dezember 2010
13. September 2010
8. August 2010
27. Februar 2010
11. Januar 2010
9. Januar 2010
15. November 2009
22. Oktober 2009
18. Oktober 2009
Undid revision 320647969 by Alainr345 (talk) This is not an article
−193
→If I'm not mistaken, EVERY Wikipedia article should start with a general description...
+193
22. September 2009
21. August 2009
17. August 2009
8. August 2009
6. Juli 2009
(Lead): when you get into the millions of transclusions, there's really little point in being specific even to the 100,000s
−1
→See also
K−1
5. Juli 2009
rv, yes and 3,200,000 has even more impact
Template is ment to indicate high usage; no need to be overly specific. 3,000,000+ has more impact.
rv, no you have more than one editor making this edit now. Stop reverting.
4. Juli 2009
3,000,000+ is specific enough (and yes, it is number of pages)
more specific
3,000,000 transclusion (not pages) per Template:high-risk update
+2
29. Juni 2009
Undid revision 299387222 by WOSlinker (talk) It's not 3,200,000 *PAGES*
−2
update transclusion count
+2